In re Bichel Optical Laboratories, Inc.
This text of 299 F. Supp. 550 (In re Bichel Optical Laboratories, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The case of Associated Electronic Supply Co. of Omaha v. C. B. S. Electronic Sales Corp., 288 F.2d 683 (8 Cir. 1961), states that a counterclaim may not be asserted as a basis for the recovery of a judgment for damages against a petitioning creditor. See also, Schreffler v. Schreffler, 155 F.2d 221, 222,10 Cir., and decisions at United States v. Verrier, 179 F.Supp. 336 and In re Love B. Woods & Co., 222 F.Supp. 161.
ORDER
The motion to dismiss Shuron Continental, Division of Textron, Inc., as a petitioning creditor has been dismissed by the Alleged Bankrupt.
The motion of the Alleged Bankrupt to amend its Amended Answer to assert a counterclaim against petitioning creditor Shuron Continental, Division of Textron, Inc., is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 F. Supp. 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bichel-optical-laboratories-inc-mnd-1969.