In re Bhatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Bhatt

77 A.D.3d 746, 908 N.Y.S.2d 608

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.D.3d 746 (In re Bhatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bhatt, 77 A.D.3d 746, 908 N.Y.S.2d 608 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by Priya G. Bhatt for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law. Ms. Bhatt was admitted to the bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on June 25, 1997. By decision and order of this Court dated June 12, 2006, her application for voluntary resignation was accepted and her name was removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Upon the papers submitted in support of the motion and the papers submitted in relation thereto, it is Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further, Ordered that, effective immediately, Priya G. Bhatt is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Priya G. Bhatt to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Rivera, Skelos and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by Priya G. Bhatt for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law. Ms. Bhatt was admitted to the bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on June 25, 1997. By decision and order of this Court dated June 12, 2006, her application for voluntary resignation was accepted and her name was removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Upon the papers submitted in support of the motion and the papers submitted in relation thereto, it is Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further, Ordered that, effective immediately, Priya G. Bhatt is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Priya G. Bhatt to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Rivera, Skelos and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.3d 746, 908 N.Y.S.2d 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bhatt-nyappdiv-2010.