In Re Bharath Ramanath v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Bharath Ramanath v. the State of Texas (In Re Bharath Ramanath v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00692-CV
IN RE Bharath RAMANATH
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 28, 2026
MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION DENIED
On October 28, 2025, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging proceedings
in Bexar County Justice Court. We dismissed the petition because we lack jurisdiction to issue a
writ of mandamus against a justice of the peace or justice court unless it is necessary to preserve
our jurisdiction. Relator filed a timely motion for rehearing on November 12, 2025, which we
denied. Relator has since filed a motion for en banc reconsideration. After considering relator’s
arguments, the motion is DENIED.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 310C2401184, styled Calvary Spy I, LLC, as Assignee of Citibank, N.a. v. Bharath Ramanath, pending in the Bexar County Justice Court, Texas, the Honorable Julie Bray Patterson presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Bharath Ramanath v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bharath-ramanath-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2026.