In Re Bharath Ramanath v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Bharath Ramanath v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 28, 2026·No. 04-25-00692-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00692-CV

IN RE Bharath RAMANATH

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice

Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 28, 2026 MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION DENIED On October 28, 2025, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging proceedings in Bexar County Justice Court. We dismissed the petition because we lack jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a justice of the peace or justice court unless it is necessary to preserve our jurisdiction. Relator filed a timely motion for rehearing on November 12, 2025, which we denied. Relator has since filed a motion for en banc reconsideration. After considering relator’s arguments, the motion is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 310C2401184, styled Calvary Spy I, LLC, as Assignee of Citibank, N.a. v. Bharath Ramanath, pending in the Bexar County Justice Court, Texas, the Honorable Julie Bray Patterson presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00692-CV

IN RE Bharath RAMANATH

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice

Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 28, 2026 MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION DENIED On October 28, 2025, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging proceedings in Bexar County Justice Court. We dismissed the petition because we lack jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a justice of the peace or justice court unless it is necessary to preserve our jurisdiction. Relator filed a timely motion for rehearing on November 12, 2025, which we denied. Relator has since filed a motion for en banc reconsideration. After considering relator’s arguments, the motion is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 310C2401184, styled Calvary Spy I, LLC, as Assignee of Citibank, N.a. v. Bharath Ramanath, pending in the Bexar County Justice Court, Texas, the Honorable Julie Bray Patterson presiding.

In Re Bharath Ramanath v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

In Re Bharath Ramanath v. the State of Texas (In Re Bharath Ramanath v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.