In re Bhalla

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Bhalla

186 A.3d 283, 233 N.J. 464

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJune 13, 2018

DocketD–57 September Term 2017; 080461

StatusPublished

This text of 186 A.3d 283 (In re Bhalla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bhalla, 186 A.3d 283, 233 N.J. 464 (N.J. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB

*28417-213 concluding that as a matter of final discipline RAVINDER SINGH BHALLA of HACKETTSTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1999, should be censured for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds); RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver to a third person funds that the person is entitled to receive) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RAVINDER SINGH BHALLA is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further **465ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB

*28417-213 concluding that as a matter of final discipline RAVINDER SINGH BHALLA of HACKETTSTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1999, should be censured for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds); RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver to a third person funds that the person is entitled to receive) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RAVINDER SINGH BHALLA is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further **465ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.3d 283, 233 N.J. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bhalla-nj-2018.