in Re B.H. and T.H.
This text of in Re B.H. and T.H. (in Re B.H. and T.H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00306-CV ___________________________
IN RE B.H. AND T.H., Relators
Original Proceeding The 355th District Court of Hood County, Texas Trial Court No. P2020018
Before Bassel, Gabriel, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and motion
for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly,
relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied. 1
Per Curiam
Delivered: October 5, 2020
1 The trial court’s September 4, 2020 order set a hearing for September 16, 2020, and ordered the trial court clerk to issue a notice for the parties to appear in person or by Zoom. The order also listed the Zoom I.D. number for that hearing. The trial court’s September 16, 2020 order recites that the trial court reviewed the evidence. We have not been provided with a record of that hearing. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re B.H. and T.H., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bh-and-th-texapp-2020.