In Re Bh and Eh

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Bh and Eh

176 S.W.3d 921

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 27, 2005

Docket08-05-00314-CV

StatusPublished

This text of 176 S.W.3d 921 (In Re Bh and Eh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Bh and Eh, 176 S.W.3d 921 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

176 S.W.3d 921 (2005)

In the Interest of B.H. and E.H., Minor Children.

No. 08-05-00314-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso.

October 27, 2005.

Steve Hershberger, Midland, for Appellant.

Bart Edward Medley, Fort Davis, for Appellee.

Before BARAJAS, C.J., McCLURE, and CHEW, JJ.

OPINION

RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice.

On September 23, 2005, this Court provided notice that it appeared from the record that the notice of appeal was not timely perfected and, therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. It also gave notice, pursuant to TEX.R.APP. P. 42.3, of the Court's intent to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The notice provided that Appellant must show grounds for continuing the appeal within ten days from the date of the notice. Not having received a response from Appellant, this Court, pursuant to Tex.R.App. P. 42.3, and on its own motion, hereby dismisses this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We therefore dismiss this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

176 S.W.3d 921 (2005)

In the Interest of B.H. and E.H., Minor Children.

No. 08-05-00314-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso.

October 27, 2005.

Steve Hershberger, Midland, for Appellant.

Bart Edward Medley, Fort Davis, for Appellee.

Before BARAJAS, C.J., McCLURE, and CHEW, JJ.

OPINION

RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice.

On September 23, 2005, this Court provided notice that it appeared from the record that the notice of appeal was not timely perfected and, therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. It also gave notice, pursuant to TEX.R.APP. P. 42.3, of the Court's intent to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The notice provided that Appellant must show grounds for continuing the appeal within ten days from the date of the notice. Not having received a response from Appellant, this Court, pursuant to Tex.R.App. P. 42.3, and on its own motion, hereby dismisses this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We therefore dismiss this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 S.W.3d 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bh-and-eh-texapp-2005.