In re Beverly

137 S. Ct. 2123, 198 L. Ed. 2d 223, 85 U.S.L.W. 3540, 2017 WL 898716, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2989
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 15, 2017
DocketNo. 16–8181.
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S. Ct. 2123 (In re Beverly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Beverly, 137 S. Ct. 2123, 198 L. Ed. 2d 223, 85 U.S.L.W. 3540, 2017 WL 898716, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2989 (U.S. 2017).

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S. Ct. 2123, 198 L. Ed. 2d 223, 85 U.S.L.W. 3540, 2017 WL 898716, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-beverly-scotus-2017.