in Re Betty Stovall (Kit) Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Betty Stovall (Kit) Clark

DecidedApril 14, 2005

Docket01-05-00004-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Betty Stovall (Kit) Clark (in Re Betty Stovall (Kit) Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Betty Stovall (Kit) Clark, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion issued April 14, 2005

In The

Court of Appeals

For the

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-05-00004-CV

IN RE BETTY STOVALL (KIT) CLARK, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINIONRelator, Betty Stovall (Kit) Clark, filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that Judge Sullivan erred by assessing $2500 in fines and eight hours of ethics continuing legal education in sanctions resulting from Clark’s discovery abuse and professional misconduct.

Holding that Clark has an adequate remedy by appeal, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Velez v. DeLara, 905 S.W.2d 23, 26 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1953, no writ).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Hanks.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI