in Re Betty Stovall (Kit) Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 14, 2005·No. 01-05-00004-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued April 14, 2005




In The

Court of Appeals

For the

First District of Texas

____________


NO. 01-05-00004-CV


IN RE BETTY STOVALL (KIT) CLARK, Relator





Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus





MEMORANDUM OPINIONRelator, Betty Stovall (Kit) Clark, filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that Judge Sullivan erred by assessing $2500 in fines and eight hours of ethics continuing legal education in sanctions resulting from Clark’s discovery abuse and professional misconduct.

          Holding that Clark has an adequate remedy by appeal, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Velez v. DeLara, 905 S.W.2d 23, 26 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1953, no writ).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Hanks.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Betty Stovall (Kit) Clark, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

in Re Betty Stovall (Kit) Clark (in Re Betty Stovall (Kit) Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cross Marine, Inc. v. Lee
905 S.W.2d 22 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)