In re Betts

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Betts

243 So. 3d 560

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 25, 2018

DocketNO. 2018–OB–0409

StatusPublished

This text of 243 So. 3d 560 (In re Betts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Betts, 243 So. 3d 560 (La. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") seeks review of the disciplinary board's ruling waiving the assessment of certain expenses against respondent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1(F).

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record of these proceedings, we find no error in the board's ruling. Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the ruling of the disciplinary board be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") seeks review of the disciplinary board's ruling waiving the assessment of certain expenses against respondent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1(F).

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record of these proceedings, we find no error in the board's ruling. Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the ruling of the disciplinary board be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 So. 3d 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-betts-la-2018.