In re Betts

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Betts

243 So. 3d 560

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 25, 2018·No. NO. 2018–OB–0409·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") seeks review of the disciplinary board's ruling waiving the assessment of certain expenses against respondent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1(F).

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record of these proceedings, we find no error in the board's ruling. Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the ruling of the disciplinary board be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") seeks review of the disciplinary board's ruling waiving the assessment of certain expenses against respondent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1(F).

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record of these proceedings, we find no error in the board's ruling. Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the ruling of the disciplinary board be affirmed.

In re Betts, 243 So. 3d 560 (La. 2018).

Pincite

243 So. 3d 560 (In re Betts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.