In re Berry

504 S.E.2d 590, 332 S.C. 323, 1998 S.C. LEXIS 113
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedAugust 12, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 504 S.E.2d 590 (In re Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Berry, 504 S.E.2d 590, 332 S.C. 323, 1998 S.C. LEXIS 113 (S.C. 1998).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking the appointment of an attorney pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this State is suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Willard D. Hanna, Jr., Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating aceounts(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Mr. Hanna shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Hanna may make disbursements from respondent’s trust aecount(s), escrow accounts), operating accounts(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Willard D. Hanna, Jr., Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, J.

/s/ James E. Moore, J.

/s/ John H. Waller, Jr„ J.

/s/ E.C, Burnett, III, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Berry
549 S.E.2d 254 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2001)
Osprey, Inc. v. Cabana Ltd. Partnership
509 S.E.2d 275 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
504 S.E.2d 590, 332 S.C. 323, 1998 S.C. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-berry-sc-1998.