In re Bernstein

3 F. Cas. 282, 2 Ben. 44
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

There is nothing shown to impeach the bona fides of the judgment, execution, and levy. No collusion in regard to them appears, and the bankrupt resisted them to his utmost. The lien of a levy made under an execution issued on a final judgment, such as is that in the present case, provided such lien attached before the commencement of the proceedings in bankruptcy, is preserved by the-bankruptcy act, and is to be respected by this court, whether this court takes to itself the administration of the property on which the lien is imposed, and applies it towards the satisfaction of the lien, pr whether it allows the state officer, who is executing the state process, to do so. In this case, the property has been sold, and the proceeds of it are in the hands of the sheriff. No advantage can result from requiring the money to be paid into this court, with a view to its application by this court in satisfaction of the lien on the property. An order will be entered allowing the sheriff to apply the proceeds of the sale of the property towards the dis[283]*283charge of the amount which he is required by the execution to make, including his charges and fees thereon, and directing him to pay the overplus, if any, to the assignee of the bankrupt, if there be one, and, if there be none, then to the clerk of this court, to the credit of the bankrupt’s estate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bernstein, 3 F. Cas. 282, 2 Ben. 44 (S.D.N.Y. 1867).

3 F. Cas. 282 (In re Bernstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Conner
11 Daly 326 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1883)
State ex rel. Hill v. Taylor
3 Mo. App. 351 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1877)
R. Moore & Co. v. State Insurance
2 Tenn. Ch. R. 379 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1875)
Warren v. Tenth National Bank
42 How. Pr. 169 (S.D. New York, 1871)