In re Bernstein

132 A.D.2d 84, 522 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49547
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Bernstein. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 A.D.2d 12

Opinion

[85]*85OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on March 25, 1959.

On May 15, 1987, the respondent entered a plea of guilty in the County Court, Suffolk County, to a charge of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law former § 155.30), a class E felony.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and it is directed that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith. The tender of the respondent’s resignation is academic.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bernstein, 132 A.D.2d 84, 522 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

132 A.D.2d 84 (In re Bernstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 90
New York JUD § 90(4)