In re Bernstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Bernstein

97 A.D.2d 821, 468 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20599

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.D.2d 821 (In re Bernstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bernstein, 97 A.D.2d 821, 468 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to compel disclosure of Grand Jury minutes, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), entered March 18, 1983, which denied the petition. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements, with leave to petitioner to renew his application, if he be so advised, at the time of trial. We are satisfied that petitioner should not be permitted to examine the Grand Jury minutes as part of his pretrial discovery proceedings in connection with his case pending in the Federal court. However, under the peculiar circumstances of this case, petitioner may renew his application, if he be so advised, at the time of trial. Weinstein, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to compel disclosure of Grand Jury minutes, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), entered March 18, 1983, which denied the petition. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements, with leave to petitioner to renew his application, if he be so advised, at the time of trial. We are satisfied that petitioner should not be permitted to examine the Grand Jury minutes as part of his pretrial discovery proceedings in connection with his case pending in the Federal court. However, under the peculiar circumstances of this case, petitioner may renew his application, if he be so advised, at the time of trial. Weinstein, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.D.2d 821, 468 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bernstein-nyappdiv-1983.