In re Bernstein

251 A.D. 836, 296 N.Y.S. 689, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7885
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 11, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 251 A.D. 836 (In re Bernstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bernstein, 251 A.D. 836, 296 N.Y.S. 689, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

In a proceeding equitable in its nature (Finlay v. Finlay, 240 N. Y. 429), involving the custody of an infant child of the parties, resettled order, in so far as it grants to the respondent, father of the infant, the right of visitation on each and every second and fourth Sunday of each and every successive month between the hours of two p. m. and four p. m., reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to renew when the infant arrives at an age, approximately twelve years, when he will have a better understanding of the situation between his parents. Appeal from original order to same effect dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R. J. v. D. J.
133 Misc. 2d 883 (NYC Family Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D. 836, 296 N.Y.S. 689, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bernstein-nyappdiv-1937.