In re Bernstein

251 A.D. 836, 296 N.Y.S. 689, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7885
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 11, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding equitable in its nature (Finlay v. Finlay, 240 N. Y. 429), involving the custody of an infant child of the parties, resettled order, in so far as it grants to the respondent, father of the infant, the right of visitation on each and every second and fourth Sunday of each and every successive month between the hours of two p. m. and four p. m., reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to renew when the infant arrives at an age, approximately twelve years, when he will have a better understanding of the situation between his parents. Appeal from original order to same effect dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bernstein, 251 A.D. 836, 296 N.Y.S. 689, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

251 A.D. 836 (In re Bernstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R. J. v. D. J.
133 Misc. 2d 883 (NYC Family Court, 1986)