In re Bernson

35 Cal. App. 344
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 19, 1917
DocketCrim. No. 580
StatusPublished

This text of 35 Cal. App. 344 (In re Bernson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bernson, 35 Cal. App. 344 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

THE COURT.

It appears to the court that the imprisonment of the petitioner from which he seeks to be discharged was voluntarily submitted to by him for the purpose of presenting in this proceeding the question as to the validity of the order holding him to answer to the superior court for trial, and for that reason the remedy by habeas corpus should not be available to him.

Upon the authority of In re Gow, 139 Cal. 242, [73 Pac. 145], Ex parte Schmitz, 150 Cal. 663, [89 Pac. 438], and Ex parte Ford, 160 Cal. 334, [Ann. Cas. 1912D, 1267, 35 [345]*345L. R A. (N. S.) 882, 116 Pac. 757], it is ordered that the proceeding be and it is hereby dismissed, and petitioner is remanded to the custody of the sheriff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Ford
116 P. 757 (California Supreme Court, 1911)
Ex Parte Schmitz
89 P. 438 (California Supreme Court, 1907)
In Re Gow
73 P. 145 (California Supreme Court, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Cal. App. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bernson-calctapp-1917.