In Re Bernson

169 P. 916, 35 Cal. App. 344, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 329
California Court of Appeal·Decided November 19, 1917·No. Crim. No. 580.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

It appears to the court that the imprisonment of the petitioner from which he seeks to be discharged was voluntarily submitted to by him for the purpose of presenting in this proceeding the question as to the validity of the order holding him to answer to the superior court for trial, and for that reason the remedy by habeas corpus should not be available to him.

Upon the authority of In re Gow, 139 Cal. 242, [73 P. 1451,Ex parte Schmitz, 150 Cal. 663, [89 P. 438], and Ex parteFord, 160 Cal. 334, [Ann. Cas. 1912D, 1267, 35 *Page 345 L. R. A. (N. S.) 882, 116 P. 757], it is ordered that the proceeding be and it is hereby dismissed, and petitioner is remanded to the custody of the sheriff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Bernson, 169 P. 916, 35 Cal. App. 344, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 329 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917).

169 P. 916 (In Re Bernson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Bocci
257 P. 888 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
In Re Ortiz
234 P. 877 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)
State v. Weller
178 P. 981 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1919)