In re Bernot

74 A.3d 925, 215 N.J. 634, 2013 WL 5506857, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 954

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Bernot. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 N.J. 117 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 4, 2013·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented on the motion for reinstatement to practice filed by ROBERT J. BERNOT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since May 3, 2013;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that respondent has paid the outstanding administrative and actual costs assessed in DRB 11-371;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and ROBERT J. BERNOT is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that respondent has paid the outstanding administrative and actual costs assessed in DRB 11-371;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and ROBERT J. BERNOT is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately-

In re Bernot, 74 A.3d 925, 215 N.J. 634, 2013 WL 5506857, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 954 (N.J. 2013).

Pincite

74 A.3d 925 (In re Bernot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.