In re Bernikow

222 A.D. 269, 226 N.Y.S. 158, 1928 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8051
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 13, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 222 A.D. 269 (In re Bernikow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bernikow, 222 A.D. 269, 226 N.Y.S. 158, 1928 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Dowling, P. J.

The respondent was admitted to the bar in September, 1919, in the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

On November 2, 1927, respondent pleaded guilty to the crime of forgery in the second degree (which crime is a felony) in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York, and was sentenced to imprisonment in State prison for a term the minimum of which was two years and six months, and the maximum ten years.

Under the provisions of section 88, subdivision 3, of the Judiciary Law, an exemplified copy of such judgment of conviction of said respondent having been presented to this court, his name is hereby ordered to be stricken from the roll of attorneys and he should be disbarred. (See Judiciary Law, §§ 477, 478.)

Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O'Malley, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hallman v. City of Pampa
147 S.W.2d 543 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 A.D. 269, 226 N.Y.S. 158, 1928 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bernikow-nyappdiv-1928.