In re Bernegger

Fourth Circuit

In re Bernegger

646 F. App'x 310

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 22, 2016·No. No. 16-1055·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peter Bernegger appeals the district court’s order denying in part and granting in part his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.E. 59(e), and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 27(a) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, [311] we grant leave to proceed in forma pa-pueris and affirm the district court’s order. In re: Peter Bernegger, No. 1:15-cv-01495-LMB-IDD (EJD.Va. Dec. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peter Bernegger appeals the district court’s order denying in part and granting in part his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.E. 59(e), and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 27(a) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, [311] we grant leave to proceed in forma pa-pueris and affirm the district court’s order. In re: Peter Bernegger, No. 1:15-cv-01495-LMB-IDD (EJD.Va. Dec. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

In re Bernegger, 646 F. App'x 310 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

646 F. App'x 310 (In re Bernegger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.