In re Bernegger

646 F. App'x 310
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 22, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1055
StatusPublished

This text of 646 F. App'x 310 (In re Bernegger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bernegger, 646 F. App'x 310 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peter Bernegger appeals the district court’s order denying in part and granting in part his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.E. 59(e), and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 27(a) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, [311]*311we grant leave to proceed in forma pa-pueris and affirm the district court’s order. In re: Peter Bernegger, No. 1:15-cv-01495-LMB-IDD (EJD.Va. Dec. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
646 F. App'x 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bernegger-ca4-2016.