In re Bernegger
This text of 646 F. App'x 310 (In re Bernegger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Peter Bernegger appeals the district court’s order denying in part and granting in part his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.E. 59(e), and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 27(a) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, [311]*311we grant leave to proceed in forma pa-pueris and affirm the district court’s order. In re: Peter Bernegger, No. 1:15-cv-01495-LMB-IDD (EJD.Va. Dec. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
646 F. App'x 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bernegger-ca4-2016.