In re Bernard
This text of 99 S.W.3d 929 (In re Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
On November 19, 2002, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t.Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon Supp.2002); see also Tex.R.App. P. 52. Appellant sought a writ of mandamus to require the trial court to hold an eviden-tiary hearing on his petition for writ of mandamus filed in the trial court. On December 16, 2002, the trial court held a hearing and denied relator’s petition. Because the trial court has held a hearing and ruled on relator’s petition in the trial court, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against the trial judge is moot.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 S.W.3d 929, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 2695, 2003 WL 1566555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bernard-texapp-2003.