In re Bernard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Bernard

18 A.D.2d 1098, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3890

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1098 (In re Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bernard, 18 A.D.2d 1098, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding by the committee of an incompetent person to direct the withdrawal of funds, for certain purposes, from two savings bank accounts which are in the name of the incompetent in trust for her daughter, the attorney for said committee appeals: (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 15, 1962, as fixed his fee in a stated amount for the services rendered by him in the proceeding; and (2) from an order of said court, dated January 7, 1963, which denied his motion for reargument and renewal on additional papers to increase the quantum of said fee. Order of January 7, 1963, reversed, without costs, and motion for reargument and renewal remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views stated in Matter of Augar (18 A D 2d 1097). Appeal from the original order of November 15, 1962 dismissed, without costs, as academic. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding by the committee of an incompetent person to direct the withdrawal of funds, for certain purposes, from two savings bank accounts which are in the name of the incompetent in trust for her daughter, the attorney for said committee appeals: (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 15, 1962, as fixed his fee in a stated amount for the services rendered by him in the proceeding; and (2) from an order of said court, dated January 7, 1963, which denied his motion for reargument and renewal on additional papers to increase the quantum of said fee. Order of January 7, 1963, reversed, without costs, and motion for reargument and renewal remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views stated in Matter of Augar (18 A D 2d 1097). Appeal from the original order of November 15, 1962 dismissed, without costs, as academic. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1098, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bernard-nyappdiv-1963.