In re Bernard
This text of 424 S.E.2d 785 (In re Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent James Curtis Bernard has petitioned for voluntary suspension of his license to practice law in the State of Georgia. Respondent, a former assistant district attorney, was convicted of attempted extortion of money from a criminal defendant in federal district court. In his petition for voluntary suspension, Respondent admits that his conviction constitutes a violation of Standard 66 of Bar Rule 4-102 (d), and thus makes him subject to the provisions of Bar Rule 4-106. Respondent asks that his petition be accepted pending termination of the appeal of his conviction.
We accept Respondent’s petition for voluntary suspension from the practice of law pending termination of his appeal. State Bar Rule [657]*6574-106.
Voluntary suspension of license accepted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
424 S.E.2d 785, 262 Ga. 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bernard-ga-1993.