In re Bernard

424 S.E.2d 785, 262 Ga. 656
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 8, 1993
DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary No. 981
StatusPublished

This text of 424 S.E.2d 785 (In re Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bernard, 424 S.E.2d 785, 262 Ga. 656 (Ga. 1993).

Opinion

Per curiam.

Respondent James Curtis Bernard has petitioned for voluntary suspension of his license to practice law in the State of Georgia. Respondent, a former assistant district attorney, was convicted of attempted extortion of money from a criminal defendant in federal district court. In his petition for voluntary suspension, Respondent admits that his conviction constitutes a violation of Standard 66 of Bar Rule 4-102 (d), and thus makes him subject to the provisions of Bar Rule 4-106. Respondent asks that his petition be accepted pending termination of the appeal of his conviction.

We accept Respondent’s petition for voluntary suspension from the practice of law pending termination of his appeal. State Bar Rule [657]*6574-106.

Decided January 8, 1993. William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia. Donald F. Samuel, for Bernard.

Voluntary suspension of license accepted.

Clarke, C. J., Hunt, P. J.,.Benham, Fletcher, Sears-Collins and Hunstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
424 S.E.2d 785, 262 Ga. 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bernard-ga-1993.