In re Bernard

424 S.E.2d 785, 262 Ga. 656, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 154, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 58
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Bernard. Read the opinion of the Court — 265 Ga. 767
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 8, 1993·No. Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 981·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

Respondent James Curtis Bernard has petitioned for voluntary suspension of his license to practice law in the State of Georgia. Respondent, a former assistant district attorney, was convicted of attempted extortion of money from a criminal defendant in federal district court. In his petition for voluntary suspension, Respondent admits that his conviction constitutes a violation of Standard 66 of Bar Rule 4-102 (d), and thus makes him subject to the provisions of Bar Rule 4-106. Respondent asks that his petition be accepted pending termination of the appeal of his conviction.

We accept Respondent’s petition for voluntary suspension from the practice of law pending termination of his appeal. State Bar Rule [657]*6574-106.

Decided January 8, 1993. William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia. Donald F. Samuel, for Bernard.

Voluntary suspension of license accepted.

Clarke, C. J., Hunt, P. J.,.Benham, Fletcher, Sears-Collins and Hunstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bernard, 424 S.E.2d 785, 262 Ga. 656, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 154, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 58 (Ga. 1993).

424 S.E.2d 785 (In re Bernard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.