In re Berkson
This text of 282 A.D. 265 (In re Berkson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There were two serious charges made against the respondent involving the conversion of funds deposited with Mm in escrow and that he knowingly issued worthless checks connected with the same transaction.
The Referee has found that the respondent’s guilt on each of the charges of professional misconduct has been established by overwhelming evidence. The record fully supports the Referee’s findings.
The report of the Referee should be confirmed and respondent should be disbarred.
Peck, P. J., Callahan, Van Voorhis and Breitel, JJ., concur.
Respondent disbarred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 265, 123 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-berkson-nyappdiv-1953.