In re Berger

817 A.2d 447
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 28, 2003
DocketNo. 783 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 817 A.2d 447 (In re Berger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Berger, 817 A.2d 447 (Pa. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2003, Daniel Eban Berger having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated July 2, 2002; the said Daniel Eban Berger having been directed on October 16, 2002, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Daniel Eban Berger is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
817 A.2d 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-berger-pa-2003.