In re Berger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Berger

275 A.D.2d 857, 715 N.Y.S.2d 167, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9358

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 21, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 857 (In re Berger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Berger, 275 A.D.2d 857, 715 N.Y.S.2d 167, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was reciprocally suspended from practice for a period of two years (248 AD2d 887) and now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order which suspended him and with this Court’s rule regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see, 22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that he has complied with the requirements of this Court’s rule regarding reinstatement (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12) and that he possesses the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice of law.

Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effectively immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI