In re Berger
This text of 800 A.2d 839 (In re Berger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-370, concluding that DANIEL E. BERGER of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violation RPC 1.8(a) (improper business transaction with a client), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that DANIEL E. BERGER is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective July 29, 2002; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further
[25]*25ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
800 A.2d 839, 173 N.J. 24, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-berger-nj-2002.