In re Bergen

240 A.D. 890

This text of 240 A.D. 890 (In re Bergen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bergen, 240 A.D. 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

In view of the unchallenged representation on the argument that petitioner was ready at Special Term to present proof of the allegations of the petition that more than enough signatures are invalid to reduce the valid signatures below 1,500, and also furnished his adversary with a list of the names challenged, the order is reversed on the law and the facts and the matter is remitted to the Special Term to take proof at once to determine if the petition contains 1,500 valid signatures. The determination shall take into consideration subdivision 4 of section 137 of the Election Law. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bergen-nyappdiv-1933.