In re Berg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Berg

21 A. 77, 139 Pa. 354, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1002

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 5, 1891·No. Nos. 89, 90·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pee, Cueiam:

There was an appeal in each of the above cases from the [358] refusal of the court below to grant the petitioner a license to sell liquors at retail. The appeal is a substitute for a certiorari, and brings up nothing but the record. That shows the petition and the refusal of the court below to grant the license. The reasons for such refusal are not material. They do not properly form any part of the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee, Cueiam:

There was an appeal in each of the above cases from the [358] refusal of the court below to grant the petitioner a license to sell liquors at retail. The appeal is a substitute for a certiorari, and brings up nothing but the record. That shows the petition and the refusal of the court below to grant the license. The reasons for such refusal are not material. They do not properly form any part of the record.

Affirmed.

In re Berg, 21 A. 77, 139 Pa. 354, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1002 (Pa. 1891).

Pincite

21 A. 77 (In re Berg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related