In re Berg
This text of 21 A. 77 (In re Berg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was an appeal in each of the above cases from the [358]*358refusal of the court below to grant the petitioner a license to sell liquors at retail. The appeal is a substitute for a certiorari, and brings up nothing but the record. That shows the petition and the refusal of the court below to grant the license. The reasons for such refusal are not material. They do not properly form any part of the record.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 A. 77, 139 Pa. 354, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-berg-pa-1891.