In re Beran

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Beran

165 A.3d 722, 230 N.J. 61, 2017 WL 3083341, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 810

DecidedJuly 20, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 165 A.3d 722 (In re Beran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Beran, 165 A.3d 722, 230 N.J. 61, 2017 WL 3083341, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 810 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-233, concluding that BARRY J. BERAN of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, should be censured for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed about the status of matter and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BARRY J. BERAN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-233, concluding that BARRY J. BERAN of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, should be censured for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed about the status of matter and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BARRY J. BERAN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 A.3d 722, 230 N.J. 61, 2017 WL 3083341, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-beran-nj-2017.