In re Beran

165 A.3d 722, 230 N.J. 61, 2017 WL 3083341, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 810
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 20, 2017·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-233, concluding that BARRY J. BERAN of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, should be censured for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed about the status of matter and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BARRY J. BERAN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Beran, 165 A.3d 722, 230 N.J. 61, 2017 WL 3083341, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 810 (N.J. 2017).

165 A.3d 722 (In re Beran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.