In re Beran

133 A.3d 280, 224 N.J. 388, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 291
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 29, 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 133 A.3d 280 (In re Beran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Beran, 133 A.3d 280, 224 N.J. 388, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 291 (N.J. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter have been duly presented pursuant to Rule 1:20-10(b), following a granting of a motion for discipline by consent in DRB 15-360 of BARRY J. BERAN of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated RPC 1.8(e) (providing financial assistance to clients in connection with pending or contemplated litigation), RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly disburse funds), and RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations);

And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct violated RPC 1.8(e), RPC 1.15(a), RPC 1.15(b), and RPC 1.15(d), and that said conduct warrants a censure or lesser discipline;

[389]*389And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a censure is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct and having granted the motion for discipline by consent in District Docket No. XIV-2014-0510E;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20 — 16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BARRY J. BERAN of CHERRY HILL is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A.3d 280, 224 N.J. 388, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-beran-nj-2016.