In re Bentivoglio

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Bentivoglio

222 Ill. 2d 628

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 2006

DocketMR 21135

StatusPublished

This text of 222 Ill. 2d 628 (In re Bentivoglio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bentivoglio, 222 Ill. 2d 628 (Ill. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent James John Bentivoglio is suspended from the practice of law for 30 days. Suspension effective December 8, 2006. Respondent James John Bentivoglio shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent James John Bentivoglio is suspended from the practice of law for 30 days. Suspension effective December 8, 2006. Respondent James John Bentivoglio shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 Ill. 2d 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bentivoglio-ill-2006.