In re Bensel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Bensel

163 A.D. 909, 147 N.Y.S. 1098

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.D. 909 (In re Bensel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bensel, 163 A.D. 909, 147 N.Y.S. 1098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellants’ efforts to settle the record without unnecessary printing, so as to raise the proper questions on appeal, have involved consultations and arrangements with the two other parties, including the corporation counsel of the city of Mew York, so that the delays hitherto are apparently excused. The motion to dismiss the appeal is; therefore, denied, with liberty to renew if the appeal record is not arranged by stipulation or duly settled by Justice Tompkins within a [910]*910reasonable time. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellants’ efforts to settle the record without unnecessary printing, so as to raise the proper questions on appeal, have involved consultations and arrangements with the two other parties, including the corporation counsel of the city of Mew York, so that the delays hitherto are apparently excused. The motion to dismiss the appeal is; therefore, denied, with liberty to renew if the appeal record is not arranged by stipulation or duly settled by Justice Tompkins within a [910]*910reasonable time. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D. 909, 147 N.Y.S. 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bensel-nyappdiv-1914.