in Re Benny Rivera Rodgers
This text of in Re Benny Rivera Rodgers (in Re Benny Rivera Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00311-CV
In re Benny Rivera Rodgers
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM CONCHO COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Benny Rivera Rodgers has filed in this Court an “Application for Writ of
Habeas Corpus to Set Bail Pending Appeal.” In the application, Rodgers asks that this Court set
bail in the amount of $10,000, “pending reversal or finality of his conviction” for the offense of
possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, in an amount less than one gram.1
This Court’s original habeas-corpus jurisdiction is limited to proceedings in which
a person’s liberty is restrained because the person has violated an order, judgment, or decree
entered in a civil case.2 We do not have original habeas-corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters,
1 Rodgers’s appeal of that conviction is currently pending in this Court under appellate cause number 03-14-00398-CR. 2 See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d); see also In re Krueger, No. 03-12-00838-CV, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 5984, at *28 (Tex. App.—Austin May 16, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (granting application for writ of habeas corpus in civil case). including the setting of bail pending appeal.3 Consequently, we must dismiss for want of jurisdiction
Rodgers’s application for writ of habeas corpus.
__________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland
File: June 25, 2015
3 See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.05 (granting original habeas-corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters to trial courts and Court of Criminal Appeals); Ortiz v. State, 299 S.W.3d 930, 932 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, no pet.); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ex parte Denby, 627 S.W.2d 435, 435 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, orig. proceeding); see also Ex parte Barnes, No. 03-13-00429-CV, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 8598, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Austin July 12, 2013, original proceeding) (mem. op.).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Benny Rivera Rodgers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-benny-rivera-rodgers-texapp-2015.