In Re Benjamin Oshea Calhoun v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Benjamin Oshea Calhoun v. the State of Texas (In Re Benjamin Oshea Calhoun v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued January 29, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00026-CR ——————————— IN RE BENJAMIN OSHEA CALHOUN, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Benjamin Oshea Calhoun, acting pro se, has filed an “Original Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus for Bond Reduction” challenging the amount and conditions
of bail in his criminal case.1 We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.2
1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Benjamin Oshea Calhoun, cause number 2591766, pending in the County Criminal Court at Law No. 8 of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Eric Ramirez presiding. 2 Relator’s petition also fails to comply with the original proceeding requirements enumerated in the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3 (form and content of petition); TEX. R. APP. P 52.7 (record). Intermediate appellate courts do not have original habeas jurisdiction in
criminal law matters. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(d) (original habeas jurisdiction
of courts of appeal is limited to cases in which person’s liberty is restrained because
person violated order, judgment, or decree entered in civil case); Chavez v. State,
132 S.W.3d 509, 510 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.). Our habeas
corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate only. See TEX. GOV’T CODE §
22.221(d); Ex parte Denby, 627 S.W.2d 435, 435 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
1981, orig. proceeding). Original habeas jurisdiction in criminal proceedings is
limited to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county
courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.05. Thus, to the extent relator seeks to
have this Court grant his application for a writ of habeas corpus for the first instance
in our Court, we lack jurisdiction to do so. See In re Saguero, No. 01-22-00167-CR,
2022 WL 850408, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 22, 2022, orig.
proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing original habeas
application seeking bail reduction for lack of jurisdiction).
Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack
of jurisdiction. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Guiney, and Morgan.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Benjamin Oshea Calhoun v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-benjamin-oshea-calhoun-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp1-2026.