In re Benjamin

262 A.D. 959, 29 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6627
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Benjamin. Read the opinion of the Court — 262 A.D. 959

Opinion

On the record submitted to the court it is impossible to determine the question of fact involved in the alleged invalidity of a large number of signatures to the petition upon which respondent Cashmore claims to have proof, and, therefore, since the hearing was not completed the court may not pass upon the question of law presented. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term, Kings County, Mr. Justice Garvin presiding, for the purpose of taking further proof. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Benjamin, 262 A.D. 959, 29 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

262 A.D. 959 (In re Benjamin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.