In re Benitz
This text of 725 A.2d 1121 (In re Benitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board on November 13, 1993, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that THOMAS B. BENITZ of MIDDLESEX, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that THOMAS B. BENITZ is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
725 A.2d 1121, 157 N.J. 637, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-benitz-nj-1999.