In Re Benedict
This text of 23 P.2d 742 (In Re Benedict) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
T.R. Benedict made application to the Public Utilities Commission under sec.
Respondent Benedict moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that it was not perfected in accordance with the provisions of sec. 59-620, I. C. A., and rule 30 of this court, in that the transcript on appeal was not transmitted to the clerk of this court or filed by him within the time designated by rule 30 of this court, to wit, "within 90 days after the service of notice of appeal with the Commission." *Page 210
The respondent having failed to accompany his motion to dismiss the appeal with a certificate, making the showing required by rule 27, of this court, the said motion will not be considered and is, therefore, denied.
The law applicable to In re Garrett Transfer Storage Co.,ante, p. 200,
Costs to respondent.
Budge, C.J., and Givens, Morgan and Wernette, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 P.2d 742, 53 Idaho 208, 1933 Ida. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-benedict-idaho-1933.