Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/In re Benedetto

In re Benedetto

770 A.2d 1155, 167 N.J. 280, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 525
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 9, 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-022 concluding pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(c), that CONRAD J. BENEDETTO of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded on the basis of respondent’s conviction in South Carolina of a misdemean- [281] or offense for practicing law in that state without a license to do so, conduct in violation of RPC 5.5(a), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CONRAD J. BENEDETTO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Benedetto, 770 A.2d 1155, 167 N.J. 280, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 525 (N.J. 2001).

770 A.2d 1155 (In re Benedetto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.