In re Belmont

386 S.E.2d 660, 259 Ga. 492

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 19, 1989·No. Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 668·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

Respondent Valerie D. Belmont was found guilty of violating Standards 22, 23, 44, and 68 of Rule 4-102 of the State Bar Rules.

Based upon these violations, the Review Panel of the State Bar Disciplinary Board recommends that respondent, Valerie D. Belmont, be disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Georgia.

It is therefore directed that Valerie D. Belmont be disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Georgia.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

Respondent Valerie D. Belmont was found guilty of violating Standards 22, 23, 44, and 68 of Rule 4-102 of the State Bar Rules.

Based upon these violations, the Review Panel of the State Bar Disciplinary Board recommends that respondent, Valerie D. Belmont, be disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Georgia.

It is therefore directed that Valerie D. Belmont be disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Georgia.

All the Justices concur.

In re Belmont, 386 S.E.2d 660, 259 Ga. 492 (Ga. 1989).

Pincite

386 S.E.2d 660 (In re Belmont) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.