In re Bellis
3 F. Cas. 132, 3 Ben. 386, 3 Nat. Bank. Reg. 199, 38 How. Pr. 79, 1869 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115
Opinion
On the facts stated by the register the five questions set forth were proper, and must be answered by the witness, and are not within the privilege of confidential communications between attorney and client.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Bellis, 3 F. Cas. 132, 3 Ben. 386, 3 Nat. Bank. Reg. 199, 38 How. Pr. 79, 1869 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115 (S.D.N.Y. 1869).
3 F. Cas. 132 (In re Bellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of OPM Leasing Services, Inc.
13 B.R. 54 (S.D. New York, 1981)