In re Bellamy
This text of 488 F. App'x 722 (In re Bellamy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Claude Wendell Bellamy petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to act on his August 13, 2012 motion. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the motion on September 4, 2012. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Bellamy’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 F. App'x 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bellamy-ca4-2012.