In re Bell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Bell

405 S.E.2d 825, 304 S.C. 529, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 113

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMay 28, 1991

Docket23406

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 405 S.E.2d 825 (In re Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bell, 405 S.E.2d 825, 304 S.C. 529, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 113 (S.C. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

A complaint was filed in this attorney grievance matter alleging that respondent committed various acts of professional misconduct. Respondent has conditionally admitted certain allegations and consents to a public reprimand. We accept the conditional admission and publicly reprimand respondent.

Respondent conditionally admits he negligently failed to maintain proper book-keeping practices in his office and negligently failed to properly supervise his staff. Because of this negligence, client funds were not timely disbursed and expenses were incorrectly posted to client accounts. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded.

Public Reprimand.

Finney and Toal, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI