In re Bell Piano Co.

155 F. 272, 1907 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 5, 1907·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

HOUGH, District Judge.

In ‘my- opinion the decision in Re Stein (D. C.) 1 Am. Bankr. Rep. 662, 94 Fed. 124, states the true interpretation: of the act, and the amendment of Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 65b, 30 Stat. 563 [U. S. Comp-. St. 1901, p. 3448], by Act Feb. 5, 19.03,: c.-487, §"15, 32 Stát. 800 [-U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 690], -strengthens Judge Baker’s opinion. To say that the final- dividend shall not be-declared-within three months after the first dividend is declared does, in my judgment, hold by implication that-a final dividend may be declared, on the expiration of three months ■ from-the' time of the first dividend:. All creditors must have notice of the final meeting, and if the .creditors who have not yet proved their claims- do not then prove ■them .they may then lawfully, as well as juétly, be debarred from participation in the funds in .hand when the final meeting is held.

The matter is remanded to the referee, with, instructions to comply ■with the petition of the trustee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bell Piano Co., 155 F. 272, 1907 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185 (S.D.N.Y. 1907).

155 F. 272 (In re Bell Piano Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re B. A. Montgomery & Son
17 F.2d 404 (N.D. Ohio, 1927)
In re Rouden Mfg. Co.
278 F. 663 (E.D. New York, 1921)
In re Hutchcraft
247 F. 187 (E.D. Kentucky, 1917)
In re Eldred
155 F. 686 (E.D. New York, 1907)