In Re Bell

248 B.R. 236, 43 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1774, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 505, 36 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 22, 2000 WL 628353
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York
DecidedMay 12, 2000
Docket1-17-10260
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 248 B.R. 236 (In Re Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Bell, 248 B.R. 236, 43 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1774, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 505, 36 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 22, 2000 WL 628353 (N.Y. 2000).

Opinion

DECISION & ORDER

JOHN C. NINFO, II, Chief Judge.

BACKGROUND

On October 29, 1998, Cheri A. Bell, f/k/a Cheri A. Snider (the “Debtor”) filed a petition initiating a Chapter 7 case. On December 3, 1998, upon the application of the Debtor, the Court entered an Order converting the case to a Chapter 13 case. At a Confirmation Hearing held on January 25, 1999, the Court confirmed the Debtor’s orally modified plan (the “Confirmed Plan”) which provided for her to make payments of $61.00 per week to the Chapter 13 Trustee by wage order for a period of three years with unsecured creditors to receive an estimated pro rata dividend of forty-five percent.

On March 23, 1999, the Court entered an Order (the “Confirmation Order”) which provided in part that: (1) the provisions of the Confirmed Plan bind the Debt- or and each creditor whether or not such creditor has objected to, accepted, or rejected the plan; (2) all of the Debtor’s wages and property of whatever nature and kind and wherever located shall remain under the exclusive jurisdiction of this Court; and (3) the Debtor shall forthwith and until further order of the Court pay to the Chapter 13 Trustee in good funds the sum of $61.00 weekly by wage order. In addition, the Confirmation Order directed the Chapter 13 Trustee to make payments with the funds received *238 from the Debtor first to administrative expenses, next to unpaid attorneys’ fees and then to effect the pro rata distribution to unsecured creditors, since there were no priority, secured or classified unsecured claims scheduled by the Debtor or provided for by the Confirmed Plan.

On February 3, 2000, the Debtor filed a Notice of Conversion (the “Conversion Notice”), and her Chapter 13 case was reconverted to a Chapter 7 case.

On March 13, 2000, the Chapter 13 Trustee filed a Final Report and Account which showed that he had forwarded to the Debtor’s bankruptcy attorney $2,568.49 in undistributed plan payments (the “Undistributed Plan Payments”) that had been made by the Debtor pursuant to the “Confirmed Plan.” 1

On March 29, 2000, Peter Scribner, Esq. (the “Chapter 7 Trustee”) filed a Motion (the “Motion”) objecting to the Debtor’s claim that the Undistributed Plan Payments were exempt. The Motion set forth that the Chapter 7 Trustee believed the issue the Court must address was not whether the Debtor could claim an exemption in the Undistributed Plan Payments, but whether they were even an asset of the Chapter 7 estate.

The Motion asserted that if reference were made to Section 348(f)(1)(A) 2 , the Undistributed Plan Payments were not an asset of the Chapter 7 estate because they were not property that remained in the possession of or under the control of the Debtor on the date of conversion. At the time of conversion, the Undistributed Plan Payments were being held by the Chapter 13 Trustee pursuant to the terms of the Confirmation Order and the Confirmed Plan.

On April 3, 2000, the Debtor interposed Opposition to the Motion which alleged that: (1) under New York Law which provides the applicable exemptions when a New York resident files Chapter 7, the Debtor had the right to claim a cash exemption of up to $2,500.00 in property of the estate, which, under the holding in Richardson, included the Undistributed Plan Payments; or (2) in the alternative, pursuant to Section 348(f)(1)(A), the Undistributed Plan Payments were a post-petition asset (post-petition wages) which was the Debtor’s asset and not an asset of the Chapter 7 estate.

In his written submissions to the Court and at oral argument, the Chapter 7 Trustee asserted that the Court should adopt the holding and reasoning of the Bankruptcy Court in In re Hardin, 200 B.R. 312 (Bankr.E.D.Ky.1996) (“Hardin”), which held that undistributed plan payments made by a debtor to a Chapter 13 trustee pursuant to a confirmed plan were not property of the Chapter 7 estate, but *239 could be distributed by the Chapter 13 trustee pursuant to the confirmed plan.

In her written submissions to the Court and at oral argument, the Debtor asserted that if the Court declined to adopt the holding in Richardson, it should adopt the holding and reasoning of the First Circuit Court of Appeals in In re Young, 66 F.3d 376 (1st Cir.1995) (“Young”), which agreed that such undistributed plan payments were not property of the Chapter 7 estate, but held that they must be returned to the Debtor.

DISCUSSION

Notwithstanding that Congress amended Section 348(f)(1)(A) by the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994 (the “Amendment”), the decisions in Hardin and Young demonstrate that, although the Amendment may have clarified the status of classic after-acquired assets such as an inheritance obtained more than 180 days after the filing of the petition, a post-petition cause of action or a tangible asset acquired with post-petition personal service earnings, its language failed to clarify what happens to undistributed plan payments when there is a conversion from a Chapter 13 case where there was a confirmed plan to a Chapter 7 case.

This is unfortunate because at the time of the enactment of the Amendment, courts were in disagreement both with respect to classic after-acquired assets, see In re Bobroff, 766 F.2d 797 (3rd Cir.1985) (Tort Claims) and In re Lybrook, 951 F.2d 136 (7th Cir.1991) (Inheritance), and undistributed plan payments, see In re Galloway, 134 B.R. 602 (Bankr.W.D.Ky.1991) (“Galloway”) and In re Nash, 765 F.2d 1410 (9th Cir.1985).

I agree with the decisions of the Bankruptcy Courts in Galloway and Hardin, and prospectively hold that undistributed plan payments in a Chapter 13 case where there has been a confirmed plan should be distributed by the Chapter 13 Trustee pursuant to the provisions of the confirmed plan and the order confirming the plan, notwithstanding that the case has been converted to a Chapter 7 case.

When the Debtor made the Undistributed Plan Payments to the Chapter 13 Trustee pursuant to the Confirmed Plan and the Confirmation Order, she did so with the intent to fulfill her obligations under the Confirmed Plan which she had voluntarily proposed. Furthermore, she made the payments with that intent at a time when she was still receiving whatever benefits she believed were significant enough for her to have converted to and proceeded in Chapter 13. 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mary Viegelahn v. Charles Harris, III
757 F.3d 468 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
In Re: Barry L. Michael v.
699 F.3d 305 (Third Circuit, 2012)
In Re John
352 B.R. 895 (N.D. Florida, 2006)
In Re Pegues
266 B.R. 328 (D. Maryland, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 B.R. 236, 43 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1774, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 505, 36 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 22, 2000 WL 628353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bell-nywb-2000.