In re Bell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Bell

742 A.2d 559, 162 N.J. 184, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 5

DecidedJanuary 6, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 742 A.2d 559 (In re Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bell, 742 A.2d 559, 162 N.J. 184, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 5 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

DANIEL S. BELL, of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1949, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DANIEL S. BELL, is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by DANIEL S. BELL, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6, which were restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court by Order dated July 26, 1999, for good cause shown, shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds into the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending further Order of this Court;' and it is further

[185]*185ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys.

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI