In Re Bell
This text of 734 N.W.2d 212 (In Re Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Rayona BELL, Minor.
Darlene King, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Department of Human Services, Respondent-Appellee.
In re Dejohnae Bell, Minor.
Darlene King, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Department of Human Services, Respondent-Appellee.
In re Ramon Bell, Minor.
Darlene King, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Department of Human Services, Respondent-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would remand this case to the trial court for consideration of the jurisdictional implications of the Indian Child Welfare Act.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
734 N.W.2d 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bell-mich-2007.