In re Bell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Bell

192 So. 3d 735, 2016 WL 3129081, 2016 La. LEXIS 981

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 22, 2016

DocketNo. 2016-B-0544

StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 3d 735 (In re Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bell, 192 So. 3d 735, 2016 WL 3129081, 2016 La. LEXIS 981 (La. 2016).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent engaged in conduct constituting a conflict of interest. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Michael T. Bell, Louisiana Bar Roll number 27740, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

KNOLL, J., dissents and assigns reasons. CLARK, J., dissents for the reasons assigned by Justice CRICHTON

CRICHTON, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI