In Re Beers

California Court of Appeal

In Re Beers

280 P. 1033, 100 Cal. App. 796, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 400

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 27, 1929

DocketDocket No. 1863.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 280 P. 1033 (In Re Beers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Beers, 280 P. 1033, 100 Cal. App. 796, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 400 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Through the medium of a writ of habeas corpus issued by order of this court, the father of a minor child (petitioner herein) seeks its custody.

[1] By the answer and return to the writ it appears that in a former habeas corpus proceeding instituted in the Superior Court by the petitioner herein in behalf of the same minor child, on the identical state of facts as are alleged in this proceeding, and against the same persons who are respondents herein, the writ was discharged. That such order constitutes a final adjudication as to the parties in this proceeding is squarely decided in each of the cases entitled In re Holt,34 Cal.App. 290 [167 P. 184], In re Frazier, 50 Cal.App. 45 [194 P. 510], and In re Gille, 65 Cal.App. 617 [224 P. 784].

The writ is discharged.

Conrey, P.J., and York, J., concurred. *Page 797

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Through the medium of a writ of habeas corpus issued by order of this court, the father of a minor child (petitioner herein) seeks its custody.

[1] By the answer and return to the writ it appears that in a former habeas corpus proceeding instituted in the Superior Court by the petitioner herein in behalf of the same minor child, on the identical state of facts as are alleged in this proceeding, and against the same persons who are respondents herein, the writ was discharged. That such order constitutes a final adjudication as to the parties in this proceeding is squarely decided in each of the cases entitled In re Holt,34 Cal.App. 290 [167 P. 184], In re Frazier, 50 Cal.App. 45 [194 P. 510], and In re Gille, 65 Cal.App. 617 [224 P. 784].

The writ is discharged.

Conrey, P.J., and York, J., concurred. *Page 797

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 P. 1033, 100 Cal. App. 796, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-beers-calctapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack