In re Bedford Watch Co.

18 F. Supp. 1009, 1937 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2034
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedApril 20, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 18 F. Supp. 1009 (In re Bedford Watch Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bedford Watch Co., 18 F. Supp. 1009, 1937 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2034 (S.D.N.Y. 1937).

Opinion

LEIBELL, District Judge.

It appears that the courts of the Confederation of Switzerland will not execute the usual commission to examine witnesses, but will recognize and execute letters rogatory. The ends of justice will therefore be better promoted by the issuance of letters rogatory. Section 309, New York Civil Practice Act. Claimants’ motion for issuance of letters rogatory is therefore granted. DeVilleneuve v. Morning Journal Ass’n (D.C.) 206 F. 70; Spellman v. Sullivan (C.C.A.) 61 F.(2d) 787.

The order to be submitted will name the witnesses to be examined. Claimants’ attorney's make affidavit that it will take three weeks for them to obtain the names of the witnesses. Submission of the order herein may therefore be delayed until claimants have the names of the prospective witnesses. The order will also provide for the filing and service of the direct interrogatories within ten days after the making of the order herein and that cross-interrogatories shall be filed and served within ten days from the service of the direct interrogatories. Objections to interrogatories and cross-interrogatories shall be presented to the court on two days’ notice and within ten days after the filing and service of the matter objected to. See Rule 9 of the General Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oscar Gruss & Son v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
41 F.R.D. 279 (S.D. New York, 1966)
In re the Estate of Kadar
6 Misc. 2d 650 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1957)
U. S. Neckwear Corp. v. Sinaco Co.
176 Misc. 51 (New York Supreme Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F. Supp. 1009, 1937 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bedford-watch-co-nysd-1937.