In re Bedell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Bedell

160 A.D.2d 208, 554 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3724

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Bedell. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 A.D.2d 99 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 3, 1990·Published

Opinion

—Motion to disbar and cross motion to hold proceedings in abeyance are unanimously granted to the extent of referring this matter to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department for a hearing at which, inter alia, the panel would better be able to evaluate the experts’ opinions, as indicated in the order of this court; and respondent’s suspension is continued until this matter is resolved, and until the further order of this court. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion to disbar and cross motion to hold proceedings in abeyance are unanimously granted to the extent of referring this matter to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department for a hearing at which, inter alia, the panel would better be able to evaluate the experts’ opinions, as indicated in the order of this court; and respondent’s suspension is continued until this matter is resolved, and until the further order of this court. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

In re Bedell, 160 A.D.2d 208, 554 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

160 A.D.2d 208 (In re Bedell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.