In re Beck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Beck

32 A.D.2d 561, 301 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4110

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 561 (In re Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Beck, 32 A.D.2d 561, 301 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondent, whom this court has suspended from the practice of law for one year, (1) to amend the order of suspension so as to reduce the discipline to a censure or (2) in the alternative to change the effective date of the commencement of the period of suspension to May 17, 1969. The order of this court, dated September 9, 1969, which imposed the suspension (30 A D 2d 920), fixed the date for the commencement of the suspension as October 9, 1968. The suspension was thereafter stayed pending appeal to the Court of Appeals. That court has affirmed the suspension (24 N Y 2d —); and the stay is no longer in effect. Motion denied insofar as it is for reduction of the discipline and otherwise granted. Order of September 9, 1968 amended so as to change the effective date of the commencement of respondent’s suspension to May 17, 1969. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent, whom this court has suspended from the practice of law for one year, (1) to amend the order of suspension so as to reduce the discipline to a censure or (2) in the alternative to change the effective date of the commencement of the period of suspension to May 17, 1969. The order of this court, dated September 9, 1969, which imposed the suspension (30 A D 2d 920), fixed the date for the commencement of the suspension as October 9, 1968. The suspension was thereafter stayed pending appeal to the Court of Appeals. That court has affirmed the suspension (24 N Y 2d —); and the stay is no longer in effect. Motion denied insofar as it is for reduction of the discipline and otherwise granted. Order of September 9, 1968 amended so as to change the effective date of the commencement of respondent’s suspension to May 17, 1969. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 561, 301 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-beck-nyappdiv-1969.